What are recommended project structure for ActivityKit in Swift?

When organizing an ActivityKit project in Swift, it's essential to adopt a clear structure to facilitate maintainability and scalability. Below are recommended project structures for ActivityKit, which can help you keep your code organized and efficient.

Recommended Project Structure

  • Source
    • Models - Define your data structures and business logic.
    • Views - Showcase user interface components, including Activity UI elements.
    • ViewModels - Manage the logic and state for your views.
    • Controllers - Manage the flow of data between models and views.
  • Services - Implement APIs and external services integration.
  • Utilities - Include helper functions and extensions.
  • Resources - Store your assets like images, icons, and localization files.
  • Tests - Organize unit and UI tests to ensure reliability.

Example ActivityKit Structure

// Example structure of an ActivityKit project ├── Source │ ├── Models │ │ └── Activity.swift │ ├── Views │ │ └── ActivityView.swift │ ├── ViewModels │ │ └── ActivityViewModel.swift │ └── Controllers │ └── ActivityController.swift ├── Services │ └── ActivityService.swift ├── Utilities │ └── Extensions.swift └── Resources ├── Images └── Localization

ActivityKit Swift project structure iOS development maintainable Swift code

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?