Error handling is a crucial aspect of using CryptoKit in Swift, especially when dealing with cryptographic functions that can fail due to invalid inputs or other unexpected conditions. This guide outlines common patterns for managing errors while ensuring security and robustness in your applications.
CryptoKit methods often throw errors that conform to Swift's Error protocol. You can handle these errors using do-catch blocks, allowing your program to respond appropriately if something goes wrong.
do {
let key = try SecureEnclave.P256.KeyAgreement.PrivateKey()
// Perform operations that might throw an error
} catch {
print("Error occurred: \(error.localizedDescription)")
}
When working with CryptoKit, it's good practice to handle specific errors to provide more clarity on what went wrong:
do {
let key = try SecureEnclave.P256.KeyAgreement.PrivateKey()
// Perform operations here
} catch let error as CryptoKitError {
switch error {
case .unsupported:
print("The specified operation is not supported.")
case .invalidKey:
print("The key you provided is invalid.")
default:
print("Unexpected error: \(error.localizedDescription)")
}
} catch {
print("Error occurred: \(error.localizedDescription)")
}
Another pattern is to use the Result type for functions that perform CryptoKit operations. This is particularly useful for returning either the success value or an error without throwing:
func performCryptoOperation() -> Result {
do {
let key = try SecureEnclave.P256.KeyAgreement.PrivateKey()
// Proceed with the operation
return .success(data)
} catch {
return .failure(error)
}
}
let result = performCryptoOperation()
switch result {
case .success(let data):
print("Operation succeeded with data: \(data)")
case .failure(let error):
print("Operation failed: \(error.localizedDescription)")
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?