What are best practices for StoreKit 2 in Swift?

StoreKit 2 offers a powerful way for developers to manage in-app purchases and subscriptions in a user-friendly manner. Following best practices ensures a seamless integration and a positive user experience.
StoreKit 2, Swift, in-app purchases, subscriptions, best practices, user experience
// Sample code for implementing StoreKit 2 in Swift import StoreKit class InAppPurchaseManager: ObservableObject { @Published var products: [Product] = [] func fetchProducts() async { do { products = try await Product.products(for: ["product_id_1", "product_id_2"]) } catch { print("Failed to fetch products: \(error)") } } func purchase(product: Product) async { do { let result = try await product.purchase() switch result { case .success(let verificationResult): // Handle successful purchase print("Purchase successful: \(verificationResult)") case .userCancelled: print("User canceled the purchase.") case .pending: print("Transaction is pending.") default: break } } catch { print("Failed to purchase product: \(error)") } } }

StoreKit 2 Swift in-app purchases subscriptions best practices user experience

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?