Testing Combine pipelines in Swift can be done by creating test cases that simulate different scenarios and verify the behavior of your publishers and subscribers. This involves using the XCTest framework alongside Combine's testing capabilities.
Combine, Swift, testing, Combine pipelines, XCTest
This guide provides an overview of how to test Combine pipelines in Swift using the XCTest framework to ensure your Combine code behaves as expected.
import XCTest
import Combine
struct User {
let name: String
}
class UserService {
func fetchUser() -> AnyPublisher {
Just(User(name: "John Doe"))
.delay(for: .seconds(1), scheduler: RunLoop.main)
.eraseToAnyPublisher()
}
}
class UserServiceTests: XCTestCase {
var cancellables = Set()
func testFetchUser() {
let expectation = XCTestExpectation(description: "Fetch User")
let userService = UserService()
userService.fetchUser()
.sink(receiveValue: { user in
XCTAssertEqual(user.name, "John Doe")
expectation.fulfill()
})
.store(in: &cancellables)
wait(for: [expectation], timeout: 2.0)
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?