How do I organize a monorepo with multiple SPM packages?

Organizing a monorepo with multiple Swift Package Manager (SPM) packages allows teams to manage dependencies, versioning, and deployment in a structured manner. By using a monorepo approach, you can streamline the development process while ensuring that all related projects are in sync.
monorepo, Swift Package Manager, SPM, package management, dependency management, version control, software development
// Example of a monorepo structure using Swift Package Manager ├── MyMonorepo │ ├── Package.swift │ ├── PackageA │ │ ├── Package.swift │ │ ├── Sources │ │ │ └── PackageA │ │ │ └── ... │ │ ├── Tests │ │ │ └── PackageATests │ │ │ └── ... │ ├── PackageB │ │ ├── Package.swift │ │ ├── Sources │ │ │ └── PackageB │ │ │ └── ... │ │ ├── Tests │ │ │ └── PackageBTests │ │ │ └── ... │ └── Shared │ ├── Sources │ │ └── SharedCode │ │ └── ... │ └── Tests │ └── SharedTests │ └── ...

monorepo Swift Package Manager SPM package management dependency management version control software development

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?