Designing adaptive layouts for all size classes in SwiftUI and UIKit requires understanding how to leverage the available tools and frameworks effectively. SwiftUI provides a declarative syntax and built-in support for adapting to different size classes, while UIKit offers more granular control through Auto Layout and size class checks. Below is an example of how to implement adaptive layouts in both frameworks.
struct ContentView: View {
var body: some View {
VStack {
if UIDevice.current.userInterfaceIdiom == .pad {
Text("This is an iPad layout!")
.font(.largeTitle)
.padding()
} else {
Text("This is an iPhone layout!")
.font(.headline)
.padding()
}
}
}
}
class ViewController: UIViewController {
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
adaptLayoutForSizeClass()
}
func adaptLayoutForSizeClass() {
if traitCollection.horizontalSizeClass == .regular {
// iPad layout
let label = UILabel()
label.text = "This is an iPad layout!"
label.font = UIFont.systemFont(ofSize: 32)
label.textAlignment = .center
view.addSubview(label)
} else {
// iPhone layout
let label = UILabel()
label.text = "This is an iPhone layout!"
label.font = UIFont.systemFont(ofSize: 16)
label.textAlignment = .center
view.addSubview(label)
}
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?