In Python, you can concatenate dictionaries using various methods depending on the version you are using. For production systems, it's crucial to choose an efficient and clear method for merging dictionaries. Below are some commonly used methods:
You can use the update()
method to merge two dictionaries, where the second dictionary will update the first.
dict1 = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
dict2 = {'b': 3, 'c': 4}
dict1.update(dict2)
print(dict1) # Output: {'a': 1, 'b': 3, 'c': 4}
You can merge dictionaries by unpacking them into a new dictionary using the **
operator.
dict1 = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
dict2 = {'b': 3, 'c': 4}
merged_dict = {**dict1, **dict2}
print(merged_dict) # Output: {'a': 1, 'b': 3, 'c': 4}
The merge (|
) operator can also be used to combine dictionaries.
dict1 = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
dict2 = {'b': 3, 'c': 4}
merged_dict = dict1 | dict2
print(merged_dict) # Output: {'a': 1, 'b': 3, 'c': 4}
Choose the method that best fits your version of Python and your specific use case!
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?