What are good alternatives to dual-life modules, and how do they compare?

When working with dual-life modules, developers often seek alternatives that might be simpler or serve a distinct purpose. Here are some noteworthy alternatives:

• Separate Perl and XS Compositions: Instead of integrating Perl and C/C++ in one module, you could create separate modules. The Perl module could handle the high-level logic while the XS or C module would be used solely for performance-critical code.
• Pure Perl Implementations: Depending on the application, consider using purely Perl-based modules that do not require the C component, which could minimize complexity and improve portability.
• Inline::C: This allows you to write C code directly within your Perl scripts. It offers a more integrated approach to using performance-critical code without the structure of a dual-life module.
• Moose/Mouse: For object-oriented programming in Perl, using Moose or Mouse can often replace the need for custom XS solutions by providing a powerful toolset for code management and efficiency.

Each of these approaches has its own advantages and disadvantages, which should be weighed based on the project's specific requirements, maintainability, and performance considerations.