Support for toolchains like ExtUtils::MakeMaker
and Module::Build
has seen significant changes across recent Perl versions, particularly in terms of compatibility, features, and community adoption. As Perl evolves, developers increasingly focus on modernizing their toolchains to improve usability and functionality.
ExtUtils::MakeMaker
has been a long-standing module for creating Makefiles. It supports a wide range of Perl versions but faces some limitations in modern coding practices. In contrast, Module::Build
offers a more flexible framework for building and installing Perl modules, appealing to developers who prefer a more object-oriented approach.
Recent Perl versions have started to favor Module::Build
for new distributions, highlighting its extensibility and easier handling of dependencies. Furthermore, community-led initiatives have worked to provide better documentation and tooling around both approaches, ensuring that developers can choose the one that best fits their needs.
To illustrate how to create a Makefile using ExtUtils::MakeMaker
and Module::Build
, consider the following examples:
use ExtUtils::MakeMaker;
WriteMakefile(
NAME => 'My::Example',
VERSION_FROM => 'lib/My/Example.pm',
PREREQ_PM => {
'Some::Module' => 0,
},
);
use Module::Build;
my $builder = Module::Build->new(
module_name => 'My::Example',
module_version => '0.01',
requires => {
'Some::Module' => 0,
},
);
$builder->create_build_script;
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?