Support for subtesting and table-driven tests in Perl has evolved considerably across different Perl versions, enhancing the testing framework's flexibility and usability. Subtests allow developers to group tests logically, making it easier to manage large test suites and to understand the organization of tests. Meanwhile, table-driven tests enable the execution of the same test logic with multiple sets of data inputs, streamlining the testing process.
Starting from Perl 5.8.0, subtests were officially introduced in the Test::More module, which significantly improved how developers could organize their tests into hierarchies. With subtests, developers can identify which blocks of tests failed without losing track of the overall test suite results.
Table-driven tests, while not formally a feature of Perl itself, can be easily implemented using the Test::More module, promoting clean and consistent testing practices. As of Perl 5.10 and beyond, various best practices surrounding table-driven tests have been shared, focusing on increasing readability and maintainability.
# Sample Perl code demonstrating subtests and table-driven tests
use strict;
use warnings;
use Test::More;
subtest 'Math operations' => sub {
my @tests = (
[ 1, 1, 2, '1 + 1 = 2' ],
[ 2, 2, 4, '2 + 2 = 4' ],
[ 3, 2, 5, '3 + 2 = 5' ],
);
foreach my $test (@tests) {
my ($a, $b, $expected, $description) = @$test;
is($a + $b, $expected, $description);
}
};
done_testing();
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?