Learn the best practices for using autocommit mode in MySQL, including when to enable or disable it and how it impacts transaction handling in your applications.
MySQL, autocommit, best practices, transactions, database management
Using autocommit mode in MySQL can significantly affect how your transactions are managed. Here are some best practices to consider:
Here's an example of how to control autocommit mode in PHP using PDO:
<?php
// Create a new PDO connection
$pdo = new PDO('mysql:host=localhost;dbname=testdb', 'username', 'password');
// Disable autocommit
$pdo->setAttribute(PDO::ATTR_AUTOCOMMIT, 0);
try {
// Begin transaction
$pdo->beginTransaction();
// Execute multiple queries
$pdo->exec("INSERT INTO users (username) VALUES ('john_doe')");
$pdo->exec("INSERT INTO users (username) VALUES ('jane_doe')");
// Commit transaction
$pdo->commit();
} catch (Exception $e) {
// Rollback transaction on error
$pdo->rollBack();
echo "Failed: " . $e->getMessage();
}
?>
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?