When should you prefer record reflection peculiarities and when should you avoid it?

In Java, records provide a compact representation of data as immutable objects. While using reflection with records can be beneficial in certain scenarios, it also has its peculiarities that developers should be aware of. Below, we outline when to prefer record reflection and when to avoid it.

When to Prefer Record Reflection

  • Flexibility: If you need to access or modify fields dynamically at runtime, reflection can provide the necessary tools.
  • Debugging: Reflection can be useful for debugging purposes, such as inspecting the fields and methods of a record.
  • Generic Programming: When you are writing utility classes or libraries that need to operate on multiple record types, reflection may simplify your code.

When to Avoid Record Reflection

  • Performance Concerns: Reflection is slower than direct method calls due to the overhead of dynamic resolution.
  • Compile-Time Safety: Using reflection bypasses compile-time checks, potentially leading to runtime errors.
  • Encapsulation Violation: Accessing private fields via reflection can break encapsulation principles of OOP.

Example

public record Person(String name, int age) {} public static void main(String[] args) { Person person = new Person("John", 30); Class> recordClass = person.getClass(); // Accessing fields via reflection for (var field : recordClass.getDeclaredFields()) { System.out.println(field.getName() + ": " + field.get(person)); } }

Java Records Reflection Object-Oriented Programming Performance Compile-Time Safety Encapsulation

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?