Serialization proxies in Java are a design pattern that allows developers to control the serialization process by creating a proxy class that handles the serialization and deserialization of the original class. This can be particularly useful for maintaining encapsulation and improving performance by avoiding the need to serialize large or complex objects directly.
When a class implements serialization with a proxy, it can delegate the serialization task to the proxy class, which manages how the state is represented and reconstructed. This approach can provide better control over the serialization process and the ability to change the implementation without affecting the serialized form.
Using serialization proxies can also help to prevent exposing sensitive data or reducing the risk of serialization attacks.
// Example of a Serialization Proxy
import java.io.*;
public class OuterClass implements Serializable {
private String data;
private transient Helper helper;
public OuterClass(String data) {
this.data = data;
this.helper = new Helper();
}
// Custom serialization
private Object writeReplace() {
return new Proxy(this.data);
}
// Proxy class for serialization
private static class Proxy implements Serializable {
private String data;
public Proxy(String data) {
this.data = data;
}
// Custom deserialization
private Object readResolve() {
return new OuterClass(data);
}
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?