When working with AtomicInteger
and AtomicReference
in Java, it's important to follow best practices to ensure thread-safety and optimal performance. These classes are part of the java.util.concurrent.atomic
package and are designed to support lock-free thread-safe programming.
AtomicInteger
for counters and values that need to be modified by multiple threads.incrementAndGet()
, decrementAndGet()
, and compareAndSet()
for atomic updates.AtomicInteger
private.get()
and then calling set()
in multiple operations, as this can lead to inconsistencies.AtomicReference
when you need to manage references to objects and ensure thread-safety.get()
and set()
methods for straightforward replacements.compareAndSet()
to perform atomic updates based on the current state.AtomicReference
; ensure that these objects are also designed for thread-safety.
// Example using AtomicInteger
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
public class AtomicIntegerExample {
private AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(0);
public void increment() {
count.incrementAndGet();
}
public int getCount() {
return count.get();
}
}
// Example using AtomicReference
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference;
public class AtomicReferenceExample {
private AtomicReference name = new AtomicReference<>("Initial Name");
public void updateName(String newName) {
name.set(newName);
}
public String getName() {
return name.get();
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?