WeakHashMap is a useful Java collection for associating keys with values without preventing the keys from being garbage collected. However, there are several alternatives that can be considered depending on your use case. Below, we compare some of these alternatives alongside WeakHashMap.
This is a thread-safe variant of Map that allows concurrent access without locking the entire map. Unlike WeakHashMap, it does not use weak references, which means keys will not be garbage collected.
A basic implementation of the Map interface, it does not allow for garbage collection of keys but is faster than both WeakHashMap and ConcurrentHashMap in scenarios where thread safety is not a concern.
Maintains insertion order of keys and offers performance benefits during iteration. Like HashMap, it does not support automatic key garbage collection.
This is similar to WeakHashMap, but uses soft references for keys, allowing for a slightly longer lifespan for mapped keys before garbage collection occurs, which might be beneficial in memory-intensive applications.
$map = new WeakHashMap();
$key = new stdClass();
$map->put($key, "Value");
echo $map->get($key); // Outputs: Value
unset($key); // Key is eligible for garbage collection now
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?