WatchService is a popular feature in Java for monitoring file system changes. However, there are several alternatives that you can consider, each with its advantages and disadvantages. Below is a comparison of some alternatives to WatchService.
import org.apache.commons.io.monitor.FileAlterationObserver;
import org.apache.commons.io.monitor.FileAlterationListener;
import org.apache.commons.io.monitor.FileAlterationMonitor;
public class FileWatcherExample {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
FileAlterationObserver observer = new FileAlterationObserver("path/to/observe");
observer.addListener(new FileAlterationListener() {
public void onFileCreate(File file) {
System.out.println("File created: " + file.getName());
}
public void onFileChange(File file) {
System.out.println("File changed: " + file.getName());
}
public void onFileDelete(File file) {
System.out.println("File deleted: " + file.getName());
}
// Implement other methods as needed...
});
FileAlterationMonitor monitor = new FileAlterationMonitor(5000, observer);
monitor.start();
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?