In Java, customizing serialization using readObject
and writeObject
methods is a common practice, but there are alternatives. Below are some of the alternatives and how they compare:
This interface allows full control over the serialization process by implementing writeExternal
and readExternal
methods. Unlike Serializable
, it requires all fields to be explicitly serialized.
This design pattern involves creating a separate proxy class that handles the serialization. It can simplify serialization logic and encapsulates the state representation more clearly.
You can structure your classes as JavaBeans and allow the default serialization behavior while using the standard getter/setter methods for controlled access.
Frameworks like Kryo or Protobuf offer efficient serialization with additional functionality. They can be faster and can support more complex types natively.
Each of these alternatives might be preferable depending on specific needs like performance and control over the serialization process.
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?