How has ConcurrentLinkedQueue changed in recent Java versions?

The ConcurrentLinkedQueue has evolved significantly with each version of Java, particularly with improvements concerning performance and efficiency in concurrent operations. Here's an overview of the changes:

  • Java 8: Introduced enhancements that utilize compare-and-swap (CAS) operations, allowing for more efficient handling of nodes.
  • Java 9: Brought improvements in the implementation of forEach methods which leverage the new Stream API, allowing for bulk operations in a more readable way.
  • Java 11: Included minor bug fixes and optimizations that further improved the performance of concurrent routines.

These changes have made ConcurrentLinkedQueue more robust and efficient for applications demanding high concurrency.

Here’s a simple example demonstrating how to use ConcurrentLinkedQueue in your code:

// Example of ConcurrentLinkedQueue usage in Java import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue; public class Example { public static void main(String[] args) { ConcurrentLinkedQueue queue = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<>(); queue.add(1); queue.add(2); queue.add(3); // Print and remove elements while (!queue.isEmpty()) { System.out.println(queue.poll()); } } }

ConcurrentLinkedQueue Java Concurrent Collections Java 8 Java 9 Java 11 Performance Improvements

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?