The use of suppressed exceptions in Java has both implications for performance and memory usage. When an exception is suppressed, it is not discarded. Instead, it is stored, and this can lead to increased memory consumption as the suppressed exceptions accumulate. Consequently, if multiple suppressed exceptions are generated during the execution of a program, this can negatively impact performance due to increased memory overhead. However, the actual runtime performance impact may vary based on specific use cases and exception management practices.
Here is an example of handling suppressed exceptions in Java:
// Example of suppressed exceptions in Java
try {
// Code that may throw an exception
throw new IOException("First exception");
} catch (IOException e) {
System.err.println("Caught: " + e.getMessage());
// Suppress the exception
try {
throw new IOException("Second exception");
} catch (IOException suppressed) {
e.addSuppressed(suppressed);
}
} finally {
for (Throwable t : e.getSuppressed()) {
System.err.println("Suppressed: " + t.getMessage());
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?