In multithreaded code, objects can exhibit unpredictable behavior due to concurrent access by multiple threads. Shared objects, when modified by different threads without proper synchronization, can lead to inconsistent states, race conditions, and data corruption. It is essential to implement proper synchronization mechanisms (such as locks, semaphores, or synchronized methods) to ensure that only one thread can access a mutable object at a time. This helps in maintaining the integrity of the object's state.
<?php
class Counter {
private $count = 0;
public function increment() {
$this->count++;
}
public function getCount() {
return $this->count;
}
}
$counter = new Counter();
function runInThread($counter) {
for ($i = 0; $i < 1000; $i++) {
$counter->increment();
}
}
// Create multiple threads
$threads = [];
for ($i = 0; $i < 10; $i++) {
$threads[$i] = new Thread(function() use ($counter) {
runInThread($counter);
});
$threads[$i]->start();
}
// Wait for all threads to finish
foreach ($threads as $thread) {
$thread->join();
}
echo "Final count: " . $counter->getCount();
?>
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?