In Java, the operations map, filter, and reduce can be used in a multithreaded context particularly when utilizing the Stream API. These operations are designed to facilitate parallel processing, thus enhancing performance by leveraging multi-core processors.
When using parallel streams, the map, filter, and reduce operations are executed concurrently across multiple threads. This means that each of these operations can significantly increase throughput by dividing the workload among available CPUs. However, developers must be cautious about shared state and ensure that operations are stateless or use appropriate synchronization techniques.
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
List numbers = Arrays.asList(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10);
// Parallel stream example
List squared = numbers.parallelStream()
.map(n -> n * n) // Map: square each number
.filter(n -> n > 20) // Filter: only keep numbers greater than 20
.collect(Collectors.toList()); // Reduce: collect results into a list
System.out.println(squared); // Output: [25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100]
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?