DatagramSocket is a class in Java that allows for the sending and receiving of UDP packets. Being connectionless and lightweight, UDP can significantly impact performance and memory usage in certain scenarios. Here are some key points to consider:
However, the lack of built-in error correction can also lead to issues in data integrity, so it's crucial to assess application-specific needs before opting for DatagramSocket.
// Example of using DatagramSocket in Java
import java.net.DatagramPacket;
import java.net.DatagramSocket;
public class UdpExample {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
DatagramSocket socket = new DatagramSocket();
byte[] sendData = "Hello UDP".getBytes();
DatagramPacket sendPacket = new DatagramPacket(sendData, sendData.length, InetAddress.getByName("localhost"), 9876);
socket.send(sendPacket);
System.out.println("Sent: " + new String(sendData));
// Receiving a response
byte[] receiveData = new byte[1024];
DatagramPacket receivePacket = new DatagramPacket(receiveData, receiveData.length);
socket.receive(receivePacket);
System.out.println("Received: " + new String(receivePacket.getData()));
socket.close();
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?