Compressed Object Pointers (oops) in Java are used to reduce the memory footprint of object references in a 64-bit JVM. When using compressed oops, object references are 32-bit instead of 64-bit, allowing for more efficient memory utilization. This can lead to improved performance, especially in applications that manage a large number of objects.
In a multithreaded environment, compressed oops can behave differently compared to a single-threaded scenario. Each thread can still access shared object references, but care must be taken to ensure that all threads are aware of the reference's compressed state. The JVM handles this in a way that is mostly transparent to developers, but understanding the implications is crucial for optimizing performance.
For example, if multiple threads are accessing and modifying a shared data structure, using compressed oops can reduce the overhead of managing larger object references, leading to better cache performance and reduced contention among threads.
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?