Automatic modules in Java can behave differently in multithreaded contexts, especially regarding encapsulation and visibility of packages. When using automatic modules, classes are made available to the entire module path, potentially leading to conflicts or unintended access. This behavior necessitates careful management of thread safety and visibility across different threads.
In a multithreaded environment, it's crucial to ensure that shared resources are properly synchronized, regardless of whether those resources are contained within automatic modules. This can help prevent issues such as race conditions and data corruption.
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
public class AutomaticModuleExample {
private static int sharedResource = 0;
public static void main(String[] args) {
ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(2);
Runnable task = () -> {
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
incrementResource();
}
};
executor.submit(task);
executor.submit(task);
executor.shutdown();
}
private synchronized static void incrementResource() {
sharedResource++;
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?