RowSet is a standard Java interface that extends the capabilities of ResultSet, making it easier to work with data in a disconnected manner. It allows you to retrieve data from a database, manipulate it, and update the database seamlessly. Modern alternatives, like JPA (Java Persistence API) and Spring Data JPA, provide a more robust and convenient way to handle data persistence, while still allowing for powerful querying capabilities.
RowSet, Java, JDBC, JPA, Spring Data JPA, Data Persistence
This content explains how to use RowSet in Java, its benefits, and modern alternatives for data access and manipulation.
// Simple example using RowSet
import javax.sql.rowset.RowSet;
import javax.sql.rowset.SqlRowSet;
import javax.sql.rowset.RowSetProvider;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import javax.sql.DataSource;
public class RowSetExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
DataSource dataSource = getDataSource(); // assume this method provides a DataSource
try {
RowSet rowSet = RowSetProvider.newFactory().createCachedRowSet();
rowSet.setDataSource(dataSource);
rowSet.setCommand("SELECT * FROM my_table");
rowSet.execute();
while (rowSet.next()) {
System.out.println("Column Value: " + rowSet.getString("column_name"));
}
} catch (SQLException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
private static DataSource getDataSource() {
// Implementation to return DataSource
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?