Deadlocks and livelocks are two types of concurrency issues that can arise in multithreaded programming. A deadlock occurs when two or more threads are waiting indefinitely for each other to release resources, while a livelock occurs when threads are actively changing states in response to each other, but still unable to proceed.
In this example, two threads are trying to acquire two locks, which causes a deadlock:
<?php
function thread1() {
lockA();
sleep(1); // Simulate some operation
lockB();
}
function thread2() {
lockB();
sleep(1); // Simulate some operation
lockA();
}
// Simulating thread execution
thread1();
thread2();
?>
In this example, two threads are trying to avoid a deadlock, but they continually yield to each other, which causes a livelock:
<?php
$thread1 = true;
$thread2 = true;
while ($thread1 || $thread2) {
if ($thread1) {
echo "Thread 1 is yielding...\n";
$thread1 = false; // Yield
$thread2 = true; // Allow Thread 2 to run
}
if ($thread2) {
echo "Thread 2 is yielding...\n";
$thread2 = false; // Yield
$thread1 = true; // Allow Thread 1 to run
}
}
?>
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?