Testing code that uses synchronization in Java can be challenging due to the inherent complexities of multithreading. It's important to ensure that the code behaves as expected when multiple threads access shared resources. Below is an example of how to effectively test synchronized code using unit tests.
// Example of a synchronized method in Java
public class Counter {
private int count = 0;
// Synchronized method to increment count
public synchronized void increment() {
count++;
}
public int getCount() {
return count;
}
}
// Test for Counter class
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
public class CounterTest {
@Test
public void testIncrement() throws InterruptedException {
Counter counter = new Counter();
Thread t1 = new Thread(() -> {
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
counter.increment();
}
});
Thread t2 = new Thread(() -> {
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
counter.increment();
}
});
t1.start();
t2.start();
t1.join();
t2.join();
assertEquals(2000, counter.getCount());
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?