Testing code that utilizes StampedLock in Java involves understanding the synchronization and lock mechanism it provides. StampedLock is a flexible locking mechanism introduced in Java 8 that allows for optimistic read locks, write locks, and read locks. Below is a simple example demonstrating how to use StampedLock and how to write tests for it.
// Example of using StampedLock
import java.util.concurrent.locks.StampedLock;
public class StampedLockExample {
private final StampedLock lock = new StampedLock();
private int value = 0;
public void increment() {
long stamp = lock.writeLock();
try {
value++;
} finally {
lock.unlockWrite(stamp);
}
}
public int getValue() {
long stamp = lock.readLock();
try {
return value;
} finally {
lock.unlockRead(stamp);
}
}
}
// Example test for StampedLock
import org.junit.Test;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
public class StampedLockTest {
@Test
public void testIncrementAndGetValue() {
StampedLockExample example = new StampedLockExample();
example.increment();
assertEquals(1, example.getValue());
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?