Testing code that uses MethodHandles in Java can be a bit tricky due to their dynamic nature. MethodHandles are part of the java.lang.invoke package, and they provide a low-level mechanism for looking up and invoking methods, fields, and constructors dynamically. Below are some approaches to test code using MethodHandles effectively.
// Example Java code using MethodHandles
import java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle;
import java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles;
import java.lang.invoke.MethodType;
public class Example {
public String greet(String name) {
return "Hello, " + name;
}
public MethodHandle getGreetMethodHandle() throws Throwable {
MethodType methodType = MethodType.methodType(String.class, String.class);
MethodHandles.Lookup lookup = MethodHandles.lookup();
return lookup.findVirtual(Example.class, "greet", methodType);
}
}
// Testing the MethodHandle
public class ExampleTest {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Throwable {
Example example = new Example();
MethodHandle methodHandle = example.getGreetMethodHandle();
String result = (String) methodHandle.invoke(example, "World");
System.out.println(result); // Outputs: Hello, World
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?