Testing code that uses just-in-time (JIT) compilation versus ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation requires an understanding of how each compilation technique impacts performance and behavior. Below is a brief explanation of both techniques and an example of how to conduct tests.
Just-in-time compilation translates code at runtime, allowing for optimizations based on actual usage patterns, while ahead-of-time compilation translates code before execution, thus giving a performance advantage in startup times but possibly lacking runtime optimizations.
To effectively test code with these two methods, you can run the same function using both compilation types and measure their performance before drawing conclusions.
// JIT Compilation Example
function testJIT() {
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < 1000000; $i++) {
// Sample operation
$a = sin($i);
}
$end = microtime(true);
echo "JIT Time: " . ($end - $start) . " seconds\n";
}
// AOT Compilation Example
function testAOT() {
$start = microtime(true);
for ($i = 0; $i < 1000000; $i++) {
// Sample operation
$a = sin($i);
}
$end = microtime(true);
echo "AOT Time: " . ($end - $start) . " seconds\n";
}
testJIT();
testAOT();
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?