The Go scheduler is responsible for managing goroutines, which are lightweight threads managed by the Go runtime. Understanding the scheduler is crucial for writing efficient concurrent Go applications. The scheduler uses a work-stealing algorithm to distribute tasks across multiple threads (OS threads) efficiently, allowing idle threads to "steal" work from busy ones. This helps in optimizing CPU usage and improving the performance of concurrent applications.
Work-stealing involves the idea that each thread has its own queue of goroutines to manage. When a thread becomes idle (i.e., it has no work to do), it can "steal" tasks from the queues of other busy threads. This mechanism helps balance the workload across all available threads.
Here's how the basic work-stealing concept operates in Go:
// Example to illustrate the concept of Go's scheduler and work-stealing
package main
import (
"fmt"
"sync"
)
func main() {
var wg sync.WaitGroup
// Start multiple goroutines
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
wg.Add(1)
go func(id int) {
defer wg.Done()
fmt.Printf("Goroutine %d is running\n", id)
}(i)
}
wg.Wait()
fmt.Println("All goroutines have completed.")
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?