When working with large result sets in Go using the pgx library, it is essential to manage memory efficiently. Streaming results allows you to process each row as it is read from the database, instead of loading the entire result set into memory at once. This approach is particularly beneficial for large datasets, as it can significantly reduce memory consumption and improve performance.
The pgx library provides a straightforward way to stream results using the `pgx.Conn.Query()` method. The result set can be iterated over, allowing you to handle each row without accumulating them in memory.
package main
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"github.com/jackc/pgx/v5"
"log"
)
func main() {
conn, err := pgx.Connect(context.Background(), "your-database-url-here")
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
defer conn.Close(context.Background())
// Example query to stream results
query := "SELECT id, name FROM large_table"
rows, err := conn.Query(context.Background(), query)
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
defer rows.Close()
// Iterate through the result set
for rows.Next() {
var id int
var name string
err = rows.Scan(&id, &name)
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
fmt.Printf("ID: %d, Name: %s\n", id, name)
}
if err = rows.Err(); err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?