How do I store sessions securely in Go?

Go, sessions, secure session management, Go programming language, web development, secure cookies
Learn how to store sessions securely in Go, ensuring the safety and integrity of user data while developing web applications.
// Example of securely storing sessions in Go using Gorilla sessions package main import ( "net/http" "github.com/gorilla/sessions" "time" ) var store = sessions.NewCookieStore([]byte("super-secret-key")) func setSession(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { session, _ := store.Get(r, "session-name") session.Values["user"] = "username" session.Values["loggedIn"] = true session.Options = &sessions.Options{ Path: "/", MaxAge: 3600, // 1 hour HttpOnly: true, // Prevents JavaScript access Secure: true, // Ensures cookies are sent over HTTPS } session.Save(r, w) } func getSession(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { session, _ := store.Get(r, "session-name") user := session.Values["user"] loggedIn := session.Values["loggedIn"] // Handle session data if loggedIn == true { w.Write([]byte("Welcome " + user.(string))) } else { w.Write([]byte("Please log in.")) } } func main() { http.HandleFunc("/set", setSession) http.HandleFunc("/get", getSession) http.ListenAndServe(":8080", nil) }

Go sessions secure session management Go programming language web development secure cookies

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?