Managing multiple binaries in a Go repository can be streamlined by organizing your code into packages and utilizing Go modules effectively. Here’s how you can structure your Go projects to handle multiple binaries efficiently:
To manage multiple binaries, it's common to create a directory named `cmd` where each subdirectory represents a different binary. Here’s an example structure:
. ├── cmd │ ├── app1 │ │ └── main.go │ └── app2 │ └── main.go ├── pkg │ └── somepackage │ └── somefile.go └── go.mod
Here's an example of how each binary (in `app1` and `app2`) could look:
// cmd/app1/main.go package main import "fmt" func main() { fmt.Println("Hello from app1!") }
// cmd/app2/main.go package main import "fmt" func main() { fmt.Println("Hello from app2!") }
To build the binaries, you can navigate to the `cmd/app1` or `cmd/app2` directories and run:
go build -o app1 go build -o app2
Alternatively, you can use the command:
go build ./cmd/app1 go build ./cmd/app2
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?