How do I implement dead-letter queues in Kafka using Go?

Implementing dead-letter queues (DLQs) in Kafka using Go is an important pattern for handling failures gracefully. A dead-letter queue is a special queue where messages that cannot be processed for some reason are sent, allowing systems to handle errors without losing data.

Steps to Implement Dead-Letter Queues in Kafka

  1. Set up your Kafka environment with a DLQ topic.
  2. Configure your producer to send messages to the primary topic.
  3. Implement message consumption with error handling.
  4. On failure, produce the erroneous message to the DLQ.

Example Code

package main import ( "log" "github.com/confluentinc/confluent-kafka-go/kafka" ) func main() { // Configure Kafka producer p, err := kafka.NewProducer(&kafka.ProducerConfig{ BootstrapServers: "localhost:9092", }) if err != nil { log.Fatalf("Failed to create producer: %s", err) } defer p.Close() // Define topic names primaryTopic := "my-topic" dlqTopic := "my-dlq" // Produce a message err = produceMessage(p, primaryTopic) if err != nil { // On error, produce to DLQ produceToDLQ(p, dlqTopic, err.Error()) } } func produceMessage(p *kafka.Producer, topic string) error { // Simulate message processing which may fail return fmt.Errorf("processing error") } func produceToDLQ(p *kafka.Producer, topic, message string) { // Produce error message to dead-letter queue p.Produce(&kafka.Message{ TopicPartition: kafka.TopicPartition{Topic: &topic, Partition: kafka.PartitionAny}, Value: []byte(message), }, nil) }

Dead-letter queues Kafka Go error handling message processing

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?