Handling message ordering in Kafka is crucial for applications that rely on the sequence of messages being maintained. In Go, you can achieve ordered message processing by using a single partition for your Kafka topic. Here's how you can manage message ordering in Kafka using Go:
package main
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"github.com/segmentio/kafka-go"
"log"
)
func main() {
// Create a new Kafka writer
w := kafka.NewWriter(kafka.WriterConfig{
Brokers: []string{"localhost:9092"},
Topic: "ordered_topic",
Balancer: &kafka.LeastBytes{},
})
defer w.Close()
// Produce messages in order
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
msg := kafka.Message{
Key: []byte(fmt.Sprintf("key-%d", i)),
Value: []byte(fmt.Sprintf("Hello Kafka %d", i)),
}
err := w.WriteMessages(context.Background(), msg)
if err != nil {
log.Fatal("could not write message ", err)
}
}
fmt.Println("Messages sent with ordering.")
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?