Committing offsets safely in RabbitMQ using Go involves ensuring messages are processed and acknowledged correctly. Below is an example of how to handle message acknowledgments properly while consuming messages from a RabbitMQ queue.
RabbitMQ, Go programming, message acknowledgment, message queue, Go RabbitMQ client
This example demonstrates safe offset committing in RabbitMQ using Go to prevent losing messages and ensure reliable message processing.
package main
import (
"log"
"github.com/streadway/amqp"
)
func main() {
conn, err := amqp.Dial("amqp://guest:guest@localhost:5672/")
if err != nil {
log.Fatalf("Failed to connect to RabbitMQ: %s", err)
}
defer conn.Close()
channel, err := conn.Channel()
if err != nil {
log.Fatalf("Failed to open a channel: %s", err)
}
defer channel.Close()
queue, err := channel.QueueDeclare(
"myQueue",
false,
false,
false,
false,
nil,
)
if err != nil {
log.Fatalf("Failed to declare a queue: %s", err)
}
msgs, err := channel.Consume(
queue.Name,
"",
false, // auto-ack is false
false,
false,
false,
nil,
)
if err != nil {
log.Fatalf("Failed to consume messages: %s", err)
}
log.Println("Waiting for messages. To exit press CTRL+C")
for d := range msgs {
log.Printf("Received a message: %s", d.Body)
// Process the message
// ...
// Acknowledge message after processing
if err := d.Ack(false); err != nil {
log.Printf("Failed to acknowledge message: %s", err)
}
}
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?