When it comes to logging in Go applications, it's essential to understand the overhead that logging can introduce. Zap, a high-performance logging library, is a popular choice for this purpose. In this guide, we will demonstrate how to benchmark logging overhead using Zap in Go.
package main
import (
"go.uber.org/zap"
"time"
)
func BenchmarkLogging(b *testing.B) {
logger, _ := zap.NewProduction()
defer logger.Sync() // flushes buffer, if any
b.ResetTimer() // Reset timer to avoid setup time
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
logger.Info("Logging an entry", zap.Int("iteration", i))
}
}
func main() {
// This function is used just for demonstration
logger, _ := zap.NewProduction()
defer logger.Sync()
start := time.Now()
for i := 0; i < 1000; i++ {
logger.Info("Logging entry", zap.Int("iteration", i))
}
elapsed := time.Since(start)
logger.Info("Logging completed", zap.Duration("elapsed", elapsed))
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?