In Go, goroutine leaks can occur when you create goroutines that are not properly terminated, leading to memory leaks and resource exhaustion. Here are some strategies to avoid goroutine leaks:
Using the context
package allows you to signal cancellation to goroutines, which helps in cleaning up resources when they are no longer needed.
package main
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"time"
)
func worker(ctx context.Context) {
for {
select {
case <-ctx.Done():
fmt.Println("Worker stopping")
return
default:
// Simulate work
time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
fmt.Println("Doing work...")
}
}
}
func main() {
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
go worker(ctx)
// Simulate running for 5 seconds
time.Sleep(5 * time.Second)
cancel() // Signal the worker to stop
time.Sleep(1 * time.Second) // Give time for the worker to finish
}
Using a worker pool can help limit the number of active goroutines.
Ensure that errors are handled properly, especially in goroutines. Ignoring errors could lead to unwanted behavior.
Utilize sync.WaitGroup
to wait for goroutines to complete before exiting the main function.
Regularly review your code for goroutines that might not exit properly under certain conditions.
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?