Which alerts should I configure for Artifact management with Grafana?

Monitor your artifact management processes effectively by configuring alerts in Grafana. This setup will help you keep track of key metrics and maintain the integrity of your software delivery pipeline.

grafana, alerts, artifact management, monitoring, devops, software delivery, metrics

// Example of configuring alerts in Grafana for Artifact Management { "alerts": [ { "title": "Artifact Upload Failure", "type": "threshold", "datasource": "MySQL Datasource", "query": "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM uploads WHERE status = 'failed'", "threshold": { "gte": 1 // Alert if there is at least one upload failure }, "notificationChannel": "alerting@example.com" }, { "title": "Artifact Storage Capacity", "type": "threshold", "datasource": "Prometheus", "query": "sum(storage_capacity) - sum(used_storage) < 10", "threshold": { "lte": 10 // Alert if available storage is less than 10 units }, "notificationChannel": "alerting@example.com" } ] }

grafana alerts artifact management monitoring devops software delivery metrics

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?