When would you choose Immutable infrastructure over VM-based workloads?

Immutable infrastructure is a modern approach to managing IT infrastructure where servers are not modified after they are deployed. Instead, new versions of the server are created for changes, which provides consistency, reduces errors, and enhances deployment speed. Choosing this approach over traditional VM-based workloads is particularly advantageous when high availability, scalability, and rapid deployment cycles are essential.
Immutable infrastructure, DevOps, VM-based workloads, deployment speed, IT infrastructure, consistency, scalability, high availability
<?php // Example Implementation of Immutable Infrastructure function deployNewVersion($appVersion) { // Build new Docker image $dockerImage = "myapp:$appVersion"; // Deploy new container exec("docker run -d --name myapp_$appVersion $dockerImage"); // Optionally remove old versions exec("docker rm -f myapp_".$oldVersion); } $newVersion = "1.0.1"; deployNewVersion($newVersion); ?>

Immutable infrastructure DevOps VM-based workloads deployment speed IT infrastructure consistency scalability high availability

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?