The rollback strategy for Azure ACR (Azure Container Registry) involves the ability to revert to a previous version of a container image in order to maintain application stability and ensure seamless deployment processes. This is crucial for ensuring that any issues introduced by new image versions can be quickly resolved without causing downtime.
Azure ACR, rollback strategy, container images, Azure, DevOps, version management, deployment strategies
<?php
// Sample rollback strategy for Azure ACR using Azure CLI
// Step 1: Identify the current image and tag
$currentImage = "myregistry.azurecr.io/myapp:latest";
// Step 2: List previous images
$previousImages = shell_exec("az acr repository show-tags --name myregistry --repository myapp --orderby time_desc --query '[0:5]' -o tsv");
// Step 3: Select the previous version to rollback
$rollbackImage = trim(explode("\n", $previousImages)[1]); // Assuming we want to rollback to the second newest image
// Step 4: Update the deployment to use the previous image
shell_exec("az webapp update --resource-group myResourceGroup --name myApp --set containerImage=$rollbackImage");
echo "Rolled back to image: $rollbackImage";
?>
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?