Helm and Kustomize are essential tools for managing Kubernetes configurations, each with unique core principles. Helm is a package manager that leverages a templating system to simplify deployment while Kustomize allows for overlays and customization without templating. Understanding their differences helps in choosing the right tool for representing Kubernetes applications efficiently.
Helm, Kustomize, Kubernetes, configuration management, templating, overlays, deployment, DevOps
# Example of a Helm Chart Structure
mychart/
├── Chart.yaml # Metadata about the chart
├── values.yaml # Default configuration values
├── templates/ # Template files
│ ├── deployment.yaml # Kubernetes Deployment template
│ └── service.yaml # Kubernetes Service template
├── charts/ # Any dependencies
└── requirements.yaml # Dependencies information
# Example of Kustomize Structure
myapp/
├── kustomization.yaml # Kustomize configuration file
├── deployment.yaml # Kubernetes Deployment resource
├── service.yaml # Kubernetes Service resource
└── overlays/ # Overlay directories for customization
├── production/
│ └── kustomization.yaml # Production-specific settings
└── staging/
└── kustomization.yaml # Staging-specific settings
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?