Progressive delivery is an important concept in modern software development, allowing for the gradual rollout of new features to minimize risk. However, there are common anti-patterns that can hinder the effectiveness of this approach. Below are some of these anti-patterns along with examples.
Improper use of feature toggles can lead to complex codebases and difficulties in tracking which features are active. This can slow down development and increase the risk of bugs.
// Example of poor feature toggle management
if ($featureToggle->isEnabled('newFeature')) {
// New feature logic
} else {
// Old feature logic
}
// Mixing feature toggles with business logic leads to confusion
Without proper metrics and monitoring in place, it is challenging to assess the impact of new features as they are rolled out. This can lead to making uninformed decisions based on incomplete data.
// Example: Missing monitoring for a new feature rollout
// Ensure you have proper tracking in place
if ($featureToggled) {
logFeatureUsage('newFeature');
// Feature logic here
}
// Lack of logging means you cannot measure success!
Failing to plan for rollbacks can lead to prolonged downtime and user dissatisfaction. A robust rollback strategy is essential in progressive delivery.
// Example of inadequate rollback handling
try {
deployNewFeature();
} catch (Exception $e) {
// Without proper rollback, the feature is stuck
// Handle rollback manually - inefficient
manualRollback();
}
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?