What are common anti-patterns for KitchenCI?

KitchenCI is an invaluable tool for testing infrastructure code, but there are several anti-patterns that can hinder your testing process. Understanding and avoiding these can lead to better configuration management practices.
KitchenCI, testing infrastructure, configuration management, anti-patterns, DevOps
// Example of a common anti-pattern: Overly complex test suites kitchen: suites: - name: complex_suite driver: name: vagrant box: ubuntu/bionic64 provisioner: name: shell run_list: - recipe[my_cookbook::default] attributes: overly_complex: - item1 - item2 # Deeply nested attributes can make tests hard to understand - nested_attributes: level1: level2: level3: - final_value: this_is_complicated

KitchenCI testing infrastructure configuration management anti-patterns DevOps

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?