What are common anti-patterns for Argo Workflows?

Argo Workflows is a powerful tool for managing complex workflows in Kubernetes, but like any technology, it comes with its own set of anti-patterns that users should be aware of. Understanding these pitfalls can help teams design more robust and maintainable workflows.

Argo Workflows, anti-patterns, Kubernetes, workflow management, best practices

Learn about common anti-patterns in Argo Workflows to avoid potential issues and create efficient, maintainable workflows in Kubernetes.

// Example of a common anti-pattern in Argo Workflows apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1 kind: Workflow metadata: name: anti-pattern-example spec: entrypoint: main templates: - name: main steps: - - name: step1 template: step-template - - name: step2 template: step-template // using the same template without understanding dependencies # This can lead to unintentional parallel execution. - name: step-template container: image: your-docker-image command: ["sh", "-c"] args: ["echo Hello World"]

Argo Workflows anti-patterns Kubernetes workflow management best practices

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?