How do you document decisions and architecture for SOPS and KMS?

When documenting decisions and architecture for SOPS (Secrets OPerationS) and KMS (Key Management Service), it's essential to provide clear guidelines and a structured approach to ensure security and efficiency. This documentation should encompass various aspects including architecture diagrams, decision rationale, and operational procedures.

Below is an example of how you might structure the documentation for SOPS and KMS.

<?php // Key Management Setup class KMSConfig { const KMS_KEY_ID = 'arn:aws:kms:region:account-id:key/key-id'; const SOPS_CONFIG = [ 'version' => '3.6.1', 'creation_rules' => [ [ 'pgp' => [ 'key' => 'YOUR_PGP_KEY_HERE', ], 'match' => [ 'anything', ], ], ], ]; } // Function to encrypt a secret using SOPS function encryptSecret($secret) { // Implementation for encryption goes here } ?>

SOPS KMS Secrets Management Documentation Architecture Security Encryption AWS PGP Key Management

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?