Measuring and improving the efficiency of Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) is crucial for a robust DevOps pipeline.
To gauge the efficiency of SAST and DAST tools, consider the following metrics:
To enhance the performance of your SAST and DAST tools, consider the following strategies:
<?php
// Example of a simple PHP script to integrate SAST and DAST
$sourceCode = file_get_contents('myapp.php');
// Simulate SAST analysis
$sastResults = performSAST($sourceCode);
echo "SAST Results: " . json_encode($sastResults);
// Assume DAST is executed in the CI/CD pipeline
// Simulate DAST analysis
$dastResults = performDAST('http://myapp.local');
echo "DAST Results: " . json_encode($dastResults);
function performSAST($code) {
// Pseudo function to perform SAST
return ['vulnerabilities' => []]; // Assume no vulnerabilities found
}
function performDAST($url) {
// Pseudo function to perform DAST
return ['vulnerabilities' => []]; // Assume no vulnerabilities found
}
?>
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?