To instrument SLO (Service Level Objectives) burn rate with OpenTelemetry, you'll need to set up metrics to track the performance of your service against its SLOs. This process involves defining custom metrics that measure both the availability and error rates of your service, allowing you to visualize the SLO burn rate over time.
Here's a simple example of how to instrument SLO burn rate using OpenTelemetry in a PHP application:
getMeter("example-meter");
// Create a counter for tracking successful requests
$successCounter = $meter->createUpDownCounter("successful_requests");
// Create a counter for tracking failed requests
$failureCounter = $meter->createUpDownCounter("failed_requests");
// Function to simulate request handling
function handleRequest($success) {
global $successCounter, $failureCounter;
if ($success) {
$successCounter->add(1);
} else {
$failureCounter->add(1);
}
}
// Simulate processing requests
handleRequest(true); // A successful request
handleRequest(false); // A failed request
// You can further implement logic to calculate the burn rate
// and expose these metrics through your observability stack.
?>
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?
How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?
How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?
How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?
How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?
How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?