How do I instrument Agile vs DevOps with OpenTelemetry?

Instrumenting Agile vs DevOps with OpenTelemetry involves understanding how to leverage observability tools to enhance both methodologies. OpenTelemetry provides a set of APIs, libraries, agents, and instrumentation that help developers gather and visualize data from their applications. By integrating OpenTelemetry, organizations can improve their Agile practices by having real-time insights into their software development life cycle while also enhancing DevOps practices by ensuring observability across the deployment pipeline.

OpenTelemetry Implementation Example

<?php // Load OpenTelemetry autoloader require 'vendor/autoload.php'; use OpenTelemetry\API\Trace\TracerProvider; use OpenTelemetry\API\Trace\Span; use OpenTelemetry\API\Trace\Tracer; // Initialize the tracer $tracerProvider = new TracerProvider(); $tracer = $tracerProvider->getTracer('example-tracer'); // Start a new span $span = $tracer->startSpan('exampleSpan'); // Simulate work sleep(1); // End the span $span->end(); ?>

Agile DevOps OpenTelemetry Observability Software Development Continuous Integration Continuous Deployment

Related Questions

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::set in multithreaded code?

How do I find elements with custom comparators with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::set for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I reserve capacity ahead of time with std::unordered_map for large datasets?

How do I erase elements while iterating with std::unordered_map in multithreaded code?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map for embedded targets?

How do I provide stable iteration order with std::map in multithreaded code?

How do I avoid rehashing overhead with std::map in performance-sensitive code?

How do I merge two containers efficiently with std::map for embedded targets?